In case you are not familiar with the blog, here is a list of the postings from July 28, 2014, to July 10, 2016:
- If the Glass Fits, Declare It: The Justice Department's ULTR for Glass that "Physically Fits Together"
- Conference to Explode DNA Forensic Analysis Through Alchemy
- State Supreme Court Approves of Variable-Prior-Odds Presentation of the Bayesian Probability of Paternity
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals Delivers Coup de Grâce to "Unqualified" Pattern-matching Testimony
- Traditional forensic pattern-matching testimony in Williams v. United States
- Proposed Uniform Language for Forensic Serology
- More NCFS Draft Documents Released for Public Comment
- Proposed Uniform Language for Forensic Toxicology
- The Department of Justice's "Proposed Uniform Language for Testimony and Reports"
- SWGFAST on "a decision to reach a conclusion" of individualization for latent fingerprints
- BIT Global Group's Next Flaky Forensics Conference
- False Justice and Prosecutors' Fallacies
- The Department of Justice's Plan for a Forensic Science Discipline Review
- Sample Evidence: What’s Wrong with ASTM E2548-11 Standard Guide for Sampling Seized Drugs?
- NIST Distances Itself from the First OSAC-approved Forensic Science Standard
- Hot Paint: Another ASTM Standard (E2937-13) that Needs More Work
- What Is a "Conservative" Method in Forensic Statistics?
- "Reasonable Scientific Certainty," the NCFS, the Law of the Courtroom," and that Pesky Passive Voice
- Is "Reasonable Scientific Certainty" Unreasonable?
- "Stress Tests" by the Department of Justice and the FBI's "Approved Scientific Standards for Testimony and Reports"
- Is OSAC Painting Itself Out of the Picture? Time to Comment on ASTM E1640-14
- Approximating Individualization: The ASTM's Standard Terminology for Digital Evidence
- Broken Glass: What Do the Data Show?
- Broken Glass, Mangled Statistics
- The First OSAC-approved Standard for Forensic Science
- Beyond the Higgs Boson: The “Prosecutor’s Fallacy” Does Not Explain Why Experimenters Are Cautious About Announcing New Discoveries
- “Statistical Lawyer’s Tricks” with DNA Mixtures in the Trial of Tommy Whack
- Alaska Court of Appeals Deems Polygraph Evidence Admissible (or Not?)
- Massachusetts Supreme Court Demands a Witness from the Same DNA Laboratory -- But Not Because of the Confrontation Clause
- Higher math in a Kansas case
- Flaky Academic Conferences
- Flaky Academic Journals
- "Remarkably Accurate": The Miami-Dade Police Study of Latent Fingerprint Identification (Pt. 3)
- More on Task Relevance in Forensic Tests
- Blinding Forensic Analysts to Task-irrelevant Information: A National Commission (NCFS) Speaks Out
- Hair Evidence in the “Clearly Not Exonerated” Exoneration of Mark Reid
- Cell Phones, Brain Cancer, and Scientific Outliers Are Not the Best Reasons to Abandon Frye v. United States
- Public Comment Period for Seven National Commission on Forensic Science Work Products To Close on 12/22
- Latent Fingerprint Identification in Flux?
- Marching Toward Improved Latent Fingerprint Testimony at the Army's Defense Forensic Science Center
- Can Forensic Pattern Matching Be Validated?
- SWGDAM Guidelines on "Probabilistic Genotyping Systems" (Part 2)
- SWGDAM Guidelines on "Probabilistic Genotyping Systems" (Part 1)
- Disentangling Two Issues in the Hair Evidence Debacle
- First NIST OSAC Forensic Science Standards Up for Public Comment
- What proves that "the expert and his methods couldn’t possibly be reliable"?
- What the FBI Hair Examiner Said About Race in State v. Manning
- Validity, Overclaiming, and Error: More on Willie Manning's Exoneration
- Justice Breyer in Glossip v. Gross on "flawed testimony from an FBI hair examiner"
- In His Own Words: Justice Scalia's Poetry Slam
- Two Scientific Issues in Glossip v. Gross
- DNA Evidence Causes Wrongful Convictions 15% of the Time!?
- Peering into Peer Review
- Frontline's Expose of DNA Testing: Yes and No
- 48 Hours for DNA
- Maryland v. King and Fourth Amendment Doctrine
- Spitting in Syracuse: Another Disgusting DNA Case
- No Relief for Jeffrey MacDonald After FBI Declares It “Exceeded the Limits of Science” with Hair Analysis
- The Junk DNA Wars
- The (Lack of) Meaning of the Supreme Court's Disposition of Raynor v. State
- Genetic Determinism and Essentialism on the Electronic Frontier
- Buza Reloaded: California Supreme Court Grants Review
- "Remarkably Accurate": The Miami-Dade Police Study of Latent Fingerprint Identification (Pt. 2)
- "Remarkably Accurate": The Miami-Dade Police Study of Latent Fingerprint Identification (Pt. 1)
- Justice Department Reverses Decision on the Mandate of the National Commission on Forensic Science
- "A Bump in the Road" for the National Commission on Forensic Science
- A Probability for Dog DNA
- Buza Reloaded: California Balancing
- Buza Reloaded: Fourth Amendment Balancing
- Buza Reloaded: The Fourth Amendment Framework
- Buza Reloaded: Court Shifts Ground But Again Invalidates California’s DNA-on-arrest Law
- Another Disgusting DNA Case: Please Flush!
- The Supreme Sound of Silence: Same-Sex Marriage and DNA Databases
- Bayes in Our Times
- Hazard Ratios and Heart Failure
- The FBI's Worst Hair Days
- A Long Shot Pays Off in Long Island
- Looking Backwards: How Safe Are Fingerprint Identifications?
